5 = Exceptional (top 5%): Outstanding performance that exceeds expectations.
4 = Strong: Fully meets judging criteria, with only minor areas for improvement.
3 = Satisfactory: Adequately meets most judging criteria, with a few opportunities for significant improvement.
2 = Needs improvement: Meets some judging criteria, with notable need for improvement.
1 = Missing or minimal: Does not meet most or all judging criteria; key components are absent or poorly addressed.
| Judging Criteria |
|---|
Message and Content · Strong rationale (“why it matters”) that is appropriate for a general audience · Clear explanation of the research question · Clear description of key experimental approaches and/or key research findings |
Clarity and Communication · Uses accessible, jargon-free language (or clearly explains necessary jargon) · Storytelling elements such as hooks, anecdotes, etc enhance understanding · Presentation is easy to follow |
Engagement and Delivery · PowerPoint slide enhances understanding of the presentation · Speaker conveys enthusiasm that fosters excitement about their research topic · Confident, engaging delivery with appropriate pace, tone, and eye contact with audience |